SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!
ISSN 2235-0225
  • JAR on FACEBOOK
  • CONTACT
  • English
    Dutch English French Italian Portuguese Spanish
  • LOGIN

JARJAR

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • PEOPLE
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • PEER REVIEW BOARD
    • PAST BOARD MEMBERS
  • JOURNAL
    • CURRENT ISSUE
    • CALLS
    • SUBMISSIONS
    • PEER REVIEW
    • ARCHIVE
  • NETWORK
JAR
JAR
Tuesday, 18 April 2017 / Published in JAR Issue 0

“Who creates the creator” – and the limits of interpretation? Anders Hultqvist

In this presentation I will discuss some associative thoughts and preliminary results arising in connection with the forthcoming production of new stage-settings of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony and Albinoni’s ‘Adagio’. The goal is to re-read and re-set the music and relieve it from some of the cultural layers and interpretational rituals that conventionally have been assigned to the pieces. The first part of the title, ‘Who creates the creator?’, refers to a question raised by Pierre Bourdieu in relation to in whose interest the present interpretational tradition is upheld? Is it for the sake of the art object or just for upholding the business around virtuosity and the genius?

http://www.jar-online.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Beethoven-123-and-take-off.mp3

I want to bring forward a slightly different story, and this from within the musical material. Both of the works are exceedingly well known and are in different ways incorporated in our cultural canon. Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony is seen as the overall emblematic piece for the whole classical tradition. Albinoni’s Adagio on the other hand plays a different role in the cultural landscape and addresses nostalgia in a more direct manner.
“A musician, as is obvious, must, in the Western musical tradition, know how to intelligently read a score… For once one leaves meaning-interpretation for — what shall I call it? — structure-interpretation, the spell of monism is broken. Why shouldn’t a structure have more than one interpretation, more than one way it goes?”
This citation from philosopher Peter Kivy can be widened, I will show, to also include the interpretation of form within a piece of music.
By presenting two, in a way opposite, interpretational strategies in the same concert program, there is a larger possibility than is usually the case, for the audience and the musicians to start reflecting on the question of musical interpretation in a broader sense. With orchestras around the world relentlessly upholding the classical and romantic tradition in their repertoire there is a great need for new interpretational angles. The two new interpretations are to be performed by the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra in October 2011.

OPEN EXPOSITION

Tagged under: Adagio, Albinoni, Beethoven, Bourdieu, Fifth symphony, musical tradition, nostalgia, Peter Kivy

What you can read next

Song No 3 – Singing through Gestures Cathy van Eck
Cargo: Dwelling in the Archive of Slavery at the Cape Mark Fleishman
Research Navigations Otto von Busch

INFORMATION

  • Publisher Information
  • Editorial Board
  • How to Submit
  • FAQ
  • Copyright Concerns
  • Terms of Use

NEWS AND Announcements

For more information on JAR and its activities please follow us on Facebook, where we will post news, opportunities, featured expositions and texts from our Network pages.

Alternatively you can sign up for SAR newsletter and announcements service. Via this email service you can receive information on SAR events, JAR publications and other information deemed relevant by SAR.

© 2017. All rights reserved. USE.studio

https://doi.org/10.22501/jar

TOP