All expositions in JAR are peer reviewed except those in our inaugural issue 0. Submissions to JAR are subjected to the appraisals of anonymous external referees, who will review the submissions independent of the work of the Editorial Board. The referees are experts in the field of artistic
research or in a specific area within that field. In artistic research, art works and art practices are typically at the centre of the research. In exposing artistic research within JAR, the artistic is intertwined with the academic. Therefore, both artists and academics are involved in assessing the
submissions. Through this form of ‘extended peer review’ JAR resonates with advanced models of refereeing, which are progressively endorsed in academia. We expect our referees to engage critically and supportively with the field of artistic research and with the submissions to JAR.
JAR is an experiment that aims to demonstrate, case by case, that it is credible to give responsibility to the researchers to define through their expositions the exact manner in which research is done in their particular case – i.e. artistically.
The Research Catalogue (RC) is a searchable, documentary database of artistic research work and its exposition. The RC is an inclusive, open-ended, bottom-up research tool that supports the journal's academic contributions.